TTS Leaderboard 2025: ElevenLabs vs Minimax vs Fish Audio vs Cartesia vs Hume AI
Comparison Criteria
The voice AI landscape has exploded with advanced text-to-speech (TTS) and voice cloning models, each offering unique strengths for creators, marketers, and developers. At Voispark, we integrate Six State-of-the-Art Models—ElevenLabs, Cartesia, Minimax, OpenAI, Fish Audio, and Orpheus—to empower your projects with All-in-One flexibility. This leaderboard cuts through technical jargon to compare these models on real-world usability, drawing from performance benchmarks and user feedback. Whether you need lifelike narration, rapid voice cloning, or multilingual support, we break down which engine excels in each scenario.
We evaluated models using these user-centric metrics:
Voice Quality
Naturalness, emotional range, and pronunciation accuracy.
Cloning Capability
Personalization ease, sample length requirements, and clone similarity.
Speed
First-byte latency and real-time streaming viability.
Language & Voice Variety
Supported languages and preset voice options.
Special Features
Emotion controls, pitch/speed adjustments, and unique tools.
Limitations
Input constraints or functional gaps.
Key Takeaways
ElevenLabs & Cartesia dominate for professional use, balancing speed and quality.
Orpheus is unmatched for dynamic conversations—perfect for AI companions.
Minimax/Fish Audio offer niche strengths: Minimax for drama, Fish Audio for budget cloning.
OpenAI suits simple multilingual tasks but lags in advanced features.
Voispark Advantage
Switch between models instantly. Use ElevenLabs for a sales pitch, Orpheus for a chatbot, and Fish Audio for rapid prototyping - all in one platform.
Your ideal model depends on use-case priorities. For most users, ElevenLabs delivers the best blend of quality and versatility, while Cartesia shines for real-time applications. Test all engines risk-free at Voispark.